Oct 052010
 

Yep.  I made it into today’s New York Times, at least the one picture I did of the ‘Ritter Dene Voss’ play.

It’s in the paper edition as well where the whole thing is bigger (page c4, bottom third).  It’s not the type of thing that you get any momentum from – it’s almost impossible to read my name – but I still get a nice feeling from being published in the Times.  Also – that shot – the setup – was mostly my idea.  The two sisters do grab for the sugar in a unison of movement during the play, but I had the idea of bringing the actor in, and how he’s posed was my idea and then shooting low enough so that the two pictures in the background show up… that was the idea of the shot.  Find something to bring the surreal quality of the play into the frame.

Here’s the link to the web edition of the New York Times Review.  And in color too.  That’s ironic.

* * *

My dad sent this email:

WOW!!!!!!!!!! That is really exciting.  Just called you and left  congratulations.  I am so glad that I took you to all those sleazy photography places in the Bronx, at night,  when you were 14 years old.  I think that Roger would be very proud of you also.

He’s talking about photography and film classes that I was in with Roger Larson at the Mosholu Y when I was 14 or younger.  That was really part of the Young Filmmakers group, and actually he didn’t take me to them, I went around the city by myself at all times of night.  My mother thought it was too dangerous and tried to stop me from going, but my father didn’t believe in protecting me from the world.

The project I was involved in went to “bad” parts of the city and showed little films that teenagers from the Brxon (at that point) made.  I would find myself riding the 4 train back to the Bronx by myself after midnight when I was 14.  He’s right about the date because we had moved to Gunhill Road at that point, and you could take the 4 train to Mosholu Parkway and walk home from there.


Oct 042010
 

10-OclockNY

I think I’ll put this one in the store.  It’s made up of image fusion, 6 images.  Lots of “second hands” or at least more than you’re supposed to have.

That new feature in Photomatix where it shows you a bunch of thumbnails with various “looks” is very cool.  They call this version Photomatix Pro, and there was no charge for upgrading.  What a concept.  Everyone else seems to want to get every last nickel out of your pocket.  At least the big companies.  Of course it won’t be long before they’re bought up by a big guy and the nice little program will be cluttered with features.  That’s happened with three or four programs that I used so far.

They were either bought up by Adobe or in one case Microsoft.  MS ruined the program they bought – I forgot the name but it was for organizing images along the lines of Lightroom but not as powerful.  As soon as MS released their first version, I downloaded it, and boom – didn’t take more than five minutes before my pc crashed.  I think it was called MediaView or something like that and I had used it for many years.

Adobe is generally okay with their purchases.  Dreamweaver was one example which they picked up and I don’t think they did much to mess it up.

Boy, I go back a long way.  I go back to the days when Oracle was one of the top three tech companies.  And before that, when dBase was the big player, and before that to the days of Visicalc. Ancient time in personal computing.  I even remember doing programming on an Atari – though that might just be a bad dream.  Was it the Atari Commodore 64?  And you moved these things called Sprites around?

Besides The Soul of a Machine (was that the book) has anyone written a good history of the personal computer?  That would be fun to read now.

Oct 042010
 

checkered-man

This fella deserves the HDR treatment!

Ah, just discovered that Photomatix 4.0 is out. Downloaded it. One nice thing is that they now show sample thumbnails along the side. This makes it very easy to get a starting point. I’m sure there’s other stuff, but I just started to play with it and I have to admit, this is a fun program to experiment with.

This is from version 4.0

checkered-man2

Obviously – this is faux hdr; since I only had the one shot of him. Hmmm…. wonder what else is new in Photomatix?

Oct 032010
 

cleopatras-needle-

Was it Hirshfeld (sp?) who would put his daughters initials in each illustration?  I did the same thing with my sisters initials (NB) in this picture.  The web image is way too small to make them out but there are 15 NBs in this one.  The shot is from an early digital rebel – Faux HDR, tonemapped, and filtered…

cleopatras-needle--crop

In the lower right-hand corner is the number 15.

I think that would make a very special gift for someone.

Oct 032010
 

You’ve followed along as I started with iMovie, then bought Final Cut Express but had a lot of trouble learning it, then went to Adobe Premiere for Windows 7 and learned it pretty well and found it the easiest to use; and then yesterday, just for the hell of it I went to Adobe Premiere 4 Pro, just to see how that seemed after all my time with Adobe Elements 7 (this is hard to follow) but it was pretty easy, and so I realized that a lot of the issues I had with Final Cut Express might have simply been that there were too many new things.

In short – last night – I fired up Final Cut Express, pulled in a bunch of stills, and believe it or not – it was pretty easy to use, at least for my pretty simple purposes of doing Ken Burns effects, and fades and dissolves etc. mostly with still images.  So there you go.  This is the best way by far, given that I have a Mac, and that Final Cut Express (the version I have) is made for the Mac OS.

The whole thing was really quite a wearing down process, and one filled with days when I thought I should just give up the whole thing.  Now using Final Cut Express is simply one more skill under my belt, and should be a lot of fun to play with.  But if you had read the early attempts – you’d never believe you’d be reading this now.  It’s also one of the reasons that I really never do or try to do reviews.  Not real reviews, because I don’t know how much of the issues have to do with my own subjective way of looking at things; and how much is real.

The only real way to do a review of new software would be if you say were working with Premiere for a long time until you really had it under your belt, and then switched to Final Cut for a year or so.  Anyway – I’ll get to play with FC today, and then tomorrow it’s back to my last big push at packaging.  I’ve printed all the orders except for two that came in today, and one that came in a few days ago which is a pretty big one for overseas.

Now you might ask – what in the world did I spend all that time working / learning the movie stuff for – and I can’t say that there is any business purpose for it – at least not right now, but photography never had any reason in the beginning other than that I enjoyed it.  It’s really not that unusual for photographers to dabble or jump full force into film (I don’t even know if you’ll be able to call it film) much longer.  There are all these rumors floating around that various pieces of feature films were done with the video features of Canon and Nikon DSLRs.  Could that really be the future for cinema?

Oct 022010
 

Give Matt Weber a visit

* * *

Weber has been the closest thing to a mentor that I’ve had in the photography business.  He’s given me a number of tips that have helped a difficult journey easier

For example, in the beginning, when someone would make me an offer for licensing an image, I’d always call him up and ask what a reasonable amount of money would be for such-and-such.  The person always had the line: you’ll get publicity from it.  That was almost never the case.  Don’t settle for less than $100 he’d say.  You are really screwing another photographer by doing that.  Of course the world has been changed by the digital revolution, and you can usually find someone to sell you or give away their work.

Early on, when I was doing a lot of negative scanning, he came by and saw that I was using a squeeze bulb thing to blow dust off the negs.  This confounded him.  Why wasn’t I using canned air?

I told him that I used to use canned air but it was getting too expensive.  From there on, whenever he’d make a trip to B&H he’d pick up a can of air for me.  And on my birthday, he’d get me a few cans of air.  That’s the sort of big heart he has.  I suppose in the beginning, he respected me because the idea of someone jumping from the corporate ocean liner into the leaking row boat in the middle of this big ocean was something to admire.

When he saw that I liked espresso coffee but that I was wasting money at Starbucks – he went out and bought me a $50 espresso maker which I’m still using.

Now you might know that I had gone back to smoking cigarettes, and on the first of July, this year, the mayor raised taxes again so that the price for a pack in New York was nearing the $14 mark.  The government in general has decided to take the place of organized crime and give the okay to bad habits so long as we paid a big chunk of the cost to them.  That’s how things are going.  As a matter of fact – California has a proposition to legalize marijuana for anyone over 21.  Finally.  The idea would be to tax it, and control it, and for California to make money off it.  That’s one of those things I’ve been waiting for since the 60′s.

Well anyway, I gave up smoking cigarettes and switched to cigars.  I can’t say it was for health reasons, but at least you don’t inhale them which is a good thing.  And then I found that I could buy boxes of cigars online from North Carolina and that they weren’t taxed at all – at least as far as I could tell.  So the cigar that might cost $10 in New York would cost me $3 if I bought a box of 25 online from NC.  I ordered lots of samples, and settled in on H. Upmanns (semi-corona size).  Matt is what you’d call a cigar aficionado and seemed to know everything about cigars.

Funny, that the subject had never really come up in all the years I knew him, except that during the summer and spring I would get a phone call from him, saying he was in my territory (Central Park) on a bench smoking a cigar.  We don’t see each other all that often, and I had never actually seen him smoke a cigar.  Later, when we were talking about it he confessed that he really only smokes maybe one or two cigars a month – but that they are very good ones.

Well, we got into the habit of my taking a cab to the west side, maybe every two or hree weeks, having dinner, and then going to smoke cigars by the Hudson.  A nice habit.  I need these sorts of habits.  It’s just part of my personality.  Maybe someday they’ll just find the nicotine gene or something.  The last time we met, two weeks back, he had gone to a store on the west side and asked the proprietor for a suggestion for me, knowing what I liked in a cigar, and we met and each smoked a small Siglo I.

It was a great smoke with an easy draw, and mild without being tasteless.  So I ordered a box and have been happily smoking them all week.

Another great tip from the mentor.  As far as photography goes, my style is nothing like Matt’s, but he has some rules that he sticks to, and that have rubbed off on me.  But that isn’t the point.  I also don’t shoot like Ansel Adams, but he was my on paper mentor when I was learning black and white photography.

Some of Matts ideas, as far as street photography goes:

- you shouldn’t hold the camera in your right hand with the strap around your wrist as  some street photographers do.  I had done that off and on, but by the time we met, I was back to my normal way of shooting which was to simply have the camera hanging around my neck.  The reason he was against this method of holding the camera in your hand was that it made you more suspicious looking.  And I think he’s right.  For street shooting, you don’t want to do anything that makes you stand out from the crowd.  What tourist holds the camera with the strap wrapped around their hand – ready to pounce on you.

- If you are working with people as forms, try and get at least two, or even better three, of the same idea in the frame.  I know what he means.  Again, I was doing this sort of thing before I met Matt but when you find someone who’s work you admire, and see that they’re after the same thing, it does give you confidence in yourself.

ThreeCouples

-  “shooting from the hip.”  He admitted there were times when there was just no other way to get the shot, but unless you had to, it was always better to put the camera to your eye.  And in my own case, I lived by this, though if I was using an LCD in live mode, I didn’t put the camera to my eye but I used the LCD in the same way.  The idea is, no matter how good you are at shooting from the hip, you’ll always have more control over what’s in the frame if you are actually looking through the viewfinder.  And I agree.  Those two edicts really did rub off on me.

Oh, and speaking about Live View – I looked at a bunch of videos of the 60D, and read more about it and from what I can tell, you still can’t focus in live view the way you can while using the viewfinder view.  I suspect the swivel will be excellent for video, which you still can’t focus while shooting (I don’t think) but the swivel is always good for shooting video.

Matt mentoring has not only been related to photography, but how to live.  How small pleasures can make life bearable. pleasures in life.

p.s.  Sorry Matt for being so hard to get in touch with lately.  That’s something that I need to work on in the future.