Oh I'll bet this has been asked and answered a billion times, but has anyone ever seen a good explanation between the difference between film grain and digital pixels.
What I mean by that is that you can take a nice "clean" digital image from a good sized noiseless sensor and with some interpolation you can go very large with it even though you are beginning with a file that is actually much smaller than a full 35mm scan which is about 78 MB (or somewhere in that area if it's RGB and 16 bit).
But as I say – I can take a much smaller digital file and easily go to that size with an interpolation program without seeing any noise or artifacts.
I'm not really saying it clearly but I remember when I began the switch from film to digital I had an idea that those grains corresponded to pixels and they just don't. Anyone ever go through the same conceptual enigma?
I had a very productive day (for a change) so I think I deserve to ask this question that has nagged at me for years.
Google+: View post on Google+












Comments