Aug 092012
 

Every few days I get an email (sometimes a phone call) that goes something like this:

Dear Mr. Beckerman,

Hope you are doing well. I understand that you might be busy this season. I would be grateful to you if you have few minutes to go through my words below and find anything interesting to proceed with.

We have studied your search engine standing and found it nearly impossible to find you on the major search engines.  We discover that for your important key phrases you rank zero.

We are a [some sort of b.s.] firm that specializes in giving search engine visibility to you firm.  In fact, we can offer a guarantee that you will be found on the first page of Google within one month of working with us.

[The basic pitch is that my site can't be found, has a terrible ranking, and that they can put me on the first page.]

And the conclusion,

Looking forward to explaining how we can help your business…

* * *

One of the first things that strikes you is, if you are doing so badly how did they find you in the first place?  The second thing that hits you is – you can’t guarantee first place for a particular key phrase on Google.  Really – I don’t care how good you are at SEO – it just don’t work that way.  So for fun, I picked the most professional sounding of these offers and responded.

* * *

A little background.  I’m an old timer on the web and dealing with search engines.  My site went up in ’99.  I think that Altavista was the big search engine at the time but I couldn’t say for sure.  What I do know is that the search engine was obviously going to be the most important way for customers to find, and that from day one I tried to understand how they worked.  At that time – going back a decade – it wasn’t as hard as you’d think.  All you needed to do was search for what you were interested in, see who popped up on the first page, and then look at their code and try and understand what they were doing to be rated so highly.

Later on it became more messy as search engines began to use a ranking system based on incoming links.  Some people began to use link farms – so that they’d have lots of links coming into their site and in theory their site would look popular to the search engines that counted incoming links.  Search engines were way to smart for that – and I never went near that scheme.   In fact, I didn’t use any scheme.  I told people what the site had on it, and I only linked to sites that I liked and didn’t try to get too fancy with SEO.

But this isn’t a how-to about SEO – so let me continue with the story.  I wrote back to one of the solicitors and asked point blank how they had found me.  They told me that they had searched for “xyz” and that I had appeared on page 10 for that.

I wrote back that they were way wrong.  If they searched for “xyz” in Google my site would appear on the first page.  (It’s even more complex than that since G is different in different countries).  At any rate they got back to me and complimented me on doing so well for my xyz key phrase.  They then picked some other phrases that they promised they could help me with.

I looked at these phrases and they weren’t particularly something someone would search for – that was related to my site.  So that made no sense.  One phrase that they picked I was already on the first page of search results…

Again, the congratulated me on doing so well.  But they could still help get a phrase on the front page.  So I asked for an example of a phrase that they could guarantee me first place ranking for.  That I was really interested in.  There’s a phrase, very related to my site, and I asked if they could guarantee within a month that they could get me on the first page or even the second page for that phrase.

Guess what.  That’s where the hemming and hawing began.

So I finally asked, what phrase would they guarantee me first page placement on and sure enough it was a phrase that had my name in it.

Duh. First off, I’m already on the first page of every search engine for my own name.

Second.  You don’t care about people that know your name.  They can always find you.

And somewhere around that point I wrote back that I wasn’t in need of their services, and they should be able to see that.

What I love though – is that – that wasn’t the end of it.

Two months later, I got another email from them – just like the first one.  Ah… so it’s all based on a program they use that finds you and starts the ball rolling…

I still get offers at least once or twice a week – but now they just get the big spam heave ho.

Now – if you really can’t figure out how to get your key phrase ranked highly – I believe some of these places could help you.  In fact, I’m sure I could help – so long as the phrase isn’t too popular and you’ve got the content to back it up.  But you can help yourself by at least getting your book about SEO or doing what I did and studying sites that rank highly for your keyword phrase.  If you don’t know how to look at the html code that makes up a browser page – then you might be better off hiring someone or using some sort of program.  But I can’t recommend any.

Aug 072012
 

For anyone that’s interested – I’m removing – actually I’ve removed the file downloads.  It just didn’t pay off.  I found that it was possible to make a small amount of money if the price was low enough – but it meant pushing and pushing and putting up advertisement posts over and over again in G+ land and the other web lands that I inhabit.

Just wasn’t worth the effort.  The sale of one print, even a small one usually brought in much more than selling a bunch of full-sized images.  People missed out on what I think was a great almost amazing deal – but the truth was that I could barely give it away.

So one day I might have a customer purchase 20 or 30 prints – and at the same time I couldn’t make a go of the file sales.  So that’s another thing I’ve learned.

The next thing was that I usually license files to companies and even to small offices that want to redecorate and they are willing to pay much more than I could get by just offering the files.  So say goodbye to a nobel idea.

Aug 072012
 

Yeah it’s true – I’ve gone to one nice big wide column for the blog.  I can put up 1000px images easily and write to my heart’s content.  If I need to add something or other I’ll put it on the top menu.  I don’t have the time to go back through everything and change the sizes… well you actually can change all the sizes with regenerate thumbnails plugin – but you’d still have to go through all the WordPress code and change that as well… though maybe there’s a plugin for that as well somewhere…  for now I’ll just use the large sizes going forward, and when I get a chance do the better shots large in the blog.

Aug 072012
 

If there ever was ever a single shot that wrapped up my career – this is it.  Okay, it’s missing the later color stuff – but it really is an incredible juxtaposition.  You’ll see the obvious Ansel Adams poster.  I began by studying Adams (he published incredible books).  I used a view camera, and gradually moved to smaller and smaller cameras.

Eventually I moved to street photography, and then to Central Park and nature and wound up with some mixture of it all.  Where’s Central Park?  He’s wearing a t-shirt with the New York parks logo.  So there are the three important aspects of my photographic history.  And to top it off, taken with the T4i (well, we are in the digital age).

I’ve grown very fond of the Canon T4i.  What finally sold me on it was that Quick Mode of Focus (which somewhere in the menu) and works well with the LCD and Live View (which is how this shot was taken).  The Live View gives me a nice grid which reminds me of the days of using the Rollei TLR, and I get to look down rather than straight at the subject – and I feel more comfortable shooting that way.  All in all – things have picked up.

I have about 70 prints that have been done with DSI (Digital Silver Imaging – www.DigitalSilverImaging.com).  They continue to do fantastic work.  I’m now completely sold on this system where I send them large jpgs with Adobe RGB to be printed on Ilford Smooth Pearl (they’ve changed the name recently to Prestige something or other) but the results are great and I get to re-use the packaging.  They are always helpful if I have some change I want to make to an order and I always feel like I’m working with a real person on the other end.

At some point, I really need to come up with a way of offering limited editions of their Silver Prints on Double Weight photographic paper (exposed by laser or whatever).  So as you see – I’ve made a round trip – both in terms of content and technique.

I sort of think this shot would make a good diptych with the Ansel shot.

Aug 032012
 

July issue of one of the most popular travel magazines in China.

Jul 292012
 

I’m afraid you’re in for a bunch of montages of actual street scenes.  I first began doing these montages about ten years ago, and they were made up of hundreds of small jpgs.  The idea has come back again, but this time I’ve been using Photoshop Panorama to stitch HDR processed images together.  They achieve the same feeling of having an incredible amount of details but are also given an interesting effect when objects (such as water) are moving and then combined as well.

These montages should really be printed large, say 40 x 40 inches to get the full effect.  At any rate, I’m just posting this as a warning that many of these studies are on the way…

Curb #1 and Apt. Reflection. Click for larger image.

This one works better…

Montage – Messenger Bikes

Jul 272012
 

I’m now at the point where I’m very comfortable with the T4i in terms of street shooting.  I will make one observation about using Live View for focusing.  Although there are three different modes, you have to be pretty lucky to use live view for street shooting.  By street shooting I mean that you want to focus quickly on a subject, lock focus and wait a second for the person to hit there spot.  I’m not talking about hyper-focus, which is possible.  But you simply can’t use the LCD and Live View for fast shooting.  Each of the three modes has their fault and I’ve gone back to shooting with the viewfinder most of the time.

Now for carefully setup shots, which I also enjoy doing, focusing with Live View is fine.  But if you are going to use it a lot, make sure to have an extra battery.

The other advantage of using the viewfinder besides focusing, is that there is no lag between shots.  I don’t mean focusing – but the lag between shots is minimal compared to Live View lag.

I’ll give you a couple of examples of how I use Live View.  If I’m going to do an overhead shot, or a low-angle shot, I’ll use the viewfinder first to get focus; then flip off the switch on the lens so focus is locked; and then turn live view and hold it over my head (as an example) and not have to worry about focusing in live view.

The same goes for some sort of careful scenic shot.  I’ll focus first with the viewfinder, lock focus, and then experiment with composition on the Live View screen.

One other bit of advise.  If I’m shooting HDR (3-shots) I will always shoot through the viewfinder.  The reason: there’s almost always something in the image that’s going to move a bit, often it’s just leaves in a tree, plus I usually hand hold the shots.  So you want the three shots (generally) to fire off as quickly as possible.  And that’s what you’ll get with the viewfinder.  Also, you can hold the camera much steadier with the camera pressed against your forehead unless you are have the camera on a tripod or something steady.  I suspect that the real purpose for the Live View screen is for movies.

Now another big selling point is the fact that the Live View Screen is a touch screen and you can fire the shutter, and even pick focus, by touching the screen.  In other words, there’s an entire second menu for operating the camera.  For me, one menu is enough.  I’m sure the time will come when the entire menu will move to the screen – but that’s going to be for a younger generation.  My fingers know where the buttons are, and I can change modes, and pretty much do whatever I need to without having to look at the buttons.  In other words – the touch screen means you’ve got to look at it and I like to prepare shots and modes etc. without having to look at the camera.

The single best feature of the swivel screen is that you can twist it in such a way that the screen is safely facing the camera, i.e. it’s well protected from scratches.

Garbage Pail in the Garbage

 

Example of handheld HDR (viewfinder) with Canon EOS T4i.  Just a regular garbage pail that was on the sidewalk to be picked up by sanitation.