The three or four motifs that appear repeatedly in my images:
1. Benches
2. Trees
3. Reflections
4. Bicycles
#photostorydlb

You go back into my childhood (if you want) and find that I was brought up on University Avenue in the Bronx. This is a wide promenade with a center strip. The center strip consists of: 1) trees, 2) benches, 3) kids on bicycles… but the reflections, that comes from an interest in surreal images that goes back to film days, i.e. if you study surreal filmmakers you will find the use of reflections to represent another world.

In fact, you can go back to Alice through the Looking Glass, which was a favorite early book.

I had several poems and photographs published in my college yearbook.

One image is of a cat peering at me through the spokes of a bicycle wheel. A poem is called Two Wheeled Demon and is about the feeling of flying on a bicycle. And there is also a night image of benches in a park.

I honestly believe that the same things that fascinated me as a child have not changed very much in my art in the last 50 years. Here's a perfect example that has three of the elements from the motif enumeration.

The only change that I can see is that the technical aspect of taking pictures has improved. But not the subjects.

Benches Reflection Poets Walk

Google+: Reshared 9 times
Google+: View post on Google+


https://plus.google.com/116247667398036716276/posts/aWvxnvGZJDp

So what in the world do I make of this experiment? The first thing is obvious:

Being in C number of circles doesn't mean that C number of people are viewing your posts.
IN THIS CASE WE ARE LOOKING AT .01 percent or one percent of one percent. More or less. I'm adding some viewers to the number that +1'd and commented figuring that a large number of people actually did see the post and decided not to participate.

Even with that addition, we're talking about 600 viewers with 600,000 circles. I don't have a better way of determining viewers of a single post unless I ask them to click on a link to my site where I have Google Analytics.

Now of course that may just be me. Maybe you are in 1000 circles and are seen by 10000 people. Maybe the greater number of circles you are in, the lower the percentage of true followers.

I've learned something. I was walking around with my chest out thinking that I was being viewed by over 600K people. That doesn't seem to be true for me. But again – that's me.

Posts that are somewhat literary, that I tag with #photostorydlb get an interesting mix of comments. Most of the comments are reactions to the photo in the story. Maybe 10% are comments about the story itself.

Even the simplest sort of stats would help such as how many of the people who circled you read English. But for now, I still walk in the dark.

And if you've got ideas about all this… feel free. If I think of anything else – I'll put it here later. For now – back to the photography world.

* * *
There are other experiments I'd like to try but I don't want to completely drive traffic away. For example, what would have happened if I had just asked for 1+ and had comments turned off. What if there was no picture. It seems to me that it's the picture that grabs people in the stream.

And of course, it would be great to do this exact same thing at a different time of day. Maybe one of you would try the BECKERMAN I SEE YOU TEST. I wonder if I would see it? I doubt it since as I said before I really only regularly check about 20 people. But it really did teach me something about how many people I'm actually reaching… and it gave me some ideas about the why.

My theory is that to increase post views, it actually takes more than content, or at least more than putting up images that you think are good. It takes – gasp – interaction with the audience. It takes (gasp again) social networking.

So I'm betting that if someone else with better social skills tries this, they will have a higher percentage of responders.

Embedded Link

Dave Beckerman – Google+ – G+ EXPERIMENT #1
Started: Feb. 13, 2012 3:12 pm
Status…

G+ EXPERIMENT #1
Started: Feb. 13, 2012 3:12 pm
Status Finished

Comments are disabled. Now what did I learn? I'll be writing it up in a few minutes……

Google+: View post on Google+


Six years ago… #photostorydlb
All venues have their problems. The energy of the last years has mainly gone into making a living. Here was my stand outside the Met. It was made from kitchen wire gadgets, and very light and easy to put together.

I live near the Museum, so it seemed like a good opportunity. Spots were first come, first reserved so you had to be there around 6 a.m. to get a good spot. And then you stayed until it got dark.

I mostly enjoyed the other "actual artists" I met along the way. It was a small community that was divided into the people who actually made what they sold, and the others who received their goods from a truck that came through in the morning and gave them cheap stock, cheap frames, and mostly copied art to sell. This latter group always did the best with the tourists as price was the main object and not originality.

Besides – original art though it may stop the passerby for a moment – cannot compete with big images of the Brooklyn Bridge that sell for 1/3rd the price of your own endeavors.

I learned the ropes from the actual artists who filled me in on various tricks, what sold, what wouldn't sell… how to arrange your images… how to talk to potential customers. It was a long grueling day.

Sometimes I could stand outside the entire day without a single sale.

Sometimes I would make a hundred dollars. But it was hard to compete with people who were selling trinkets.

For example, the most successful seller wrote your name in Chinese looking characters on a ribbon of paper. Cost for this was $5. He always had a line of tourists waiting to have their names spelled out.

And there was the group of people who worked for the same organization – who were spread out at perfect spots each morning selling images that had been scanned from art books of New York. At the time, they were Chinese and one or two guys from Tibet. Later something happened and the Chinese disappeared and were replaced by Russians.

I was there long enough to see the Russians leave and be replaced by the Chinese again.

I made many mistakes. All the materials I used were archival. The paper was expensive. I matted the prints with archival double weight mats and signed each one.

Another mistake I made was to speak with photographers. Oh, the photographers were the bane of sales. They would hang around and just want to talk about what equipment you used which distracted you from catching the eye of someone that was showing interest. That was the biggest lesson.

It was important to give the photographers the brush off as quickly as you could if you wanted to make sales.

And the other thing was – don't even talk to the men. They were there to escort their wives or girlfriends – but had no eye for actual art. Women were 90% of your patrons – and this was acknowledged by women sellers as well.

It was a tough time – but sort of enjoyable as well if the weather was good.

A favorite and ancient ploy was to have another seller come by and just stand in front of your stand picking up and looking at images. The shill. Sometimes we'd pretend to make a sale and publicly exchange money which would be returned later. This almost always drew a crowd. If one person was buying your work, it would draw a crowd. But you couldn't do it all the time with the same person – and sellers had to leave their own stands unattended to do the trick.

I guess that idea of the shill, which you see all the time with street hustlers, has got to go back into ancient history. I can picture 2000 years ago, maybe in a Greek Agora – a shill pretending to buy a clay pot.

Google+: Reshared 1 times
Google+: View post on Google+


The Palace Restaurant

#photostorydlb Photo courtesy of (shot by) James Maher (my prints in the Palace Restaurant, 34th street just east of Park Avenue, two floors) What were my goals when I took my place on the web in 1999 to sell photographs? Very simple, to make a living at it without changing what I shot. In other words, I can remember saying to myself (I talk to myself a lot) that I wouldn't change what I was [more]


Mosholu Parkway

Place: Bronx, New YorkWorkflow: #palindromedlb This was the subway station that is near the end of the line in the Bronx and was where I emerged at the end of the daily trek into the city. From here, I walk along Jerome Avenue then make a right onto Gunhill Road and walk down to a small street called Putnam Place which is about one block long and directly across from Woodlawn Cemetery. Jerome Avenue was [more]


Park Avenue Palindrome

Every so often, during the summer, Park Avenue is opened up for bike traffic and cars are banned. This was shot from beneath the Helmsley Arch (if that's what it's called) and then given the VisualPalindrome treatment. Which is to say that the right side is a mirror of the left side. So if you are coming to New York for the first time – don't going looking for this view – since it doesn't [more]


Edgar A Poe

#photostorydlb Home on Fordham Road and the Grand Concourse, Bronx New York. When I was in Paris, the first thing I noticed was how many streets were named after artists, writers and musicians. I never found this to be true in the states. At any rate, while I was working on my photo book about the Bronx, I did try to find the great landmarks and came to the conclusion that this little home where [more]


Cameraman, Wild Style 1982

#photostorydlb In 1982 I worked as an all around production assistant, bag carrier, dolly-pusher etc. on a film called Wild Style. It was produced / directed by Charlie Ahearn – and mostly shot in the Bronx (my hometown). There was a lot of work done in small hip-hop clubs and this is a shot of one of the cinematographers – John Foster. The film was either the first or one of the first films to [more]


Kids in Tree

Yes – Go Giants. #photostorydlb As a kid growing up in the Bronx, we somehow always had trees around to climb. I'll bet you didn't know this but the Bronx has more parks than any other borough. I'm not saying that you want to go in them at night – but during the day they were pretty safe when I was a kid. The neighborhood was divided into two groups: Irish and everyone else. The [more]

Photoblogs.com

Newsletter

Newsletter Signup Get notified if there are discounts, or even better, big news.